Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the acf domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/vhosts/triadclients.com/tollers.triadclients.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Corporate Options For Charities | Tollers Solicitors

Corporate Options For Charities

Date Added 07.12.16 - All information was correct at the time of writing and posting

Having decided that you wish to form a new charity with a corporate structure or perhaps transfer an existing charity to a corporate structure you have two options.

Options

  • A company limited by guarantee (“CLG”) which is a company without share capital. This has traditionally been the popular choice.
  • A charitable incorporated organisation (“CIO”). This is a more recently introduced type of charity structure. A CIO is similar to a company. There are two different types: Foundation CIO’s and Association CIO’s. With a Foundation CIO the only voting members are the Trustees whereas with an Association CIO, the voting membership is much wider than the Trustees. The latter is usually more appropriate where the charity has a wide voting membership.

The main advantage of a charity corporate structure as opposed to a personal charitable trust is that being a separate legal entity it  gives the members or trustees of the charity the benefit of limited liability and personal protection against the legal consequences of, for example, entering into contracts, holding property and employing staff.

Advantages and Disadvantages

The advantages and disadvantages of each type of structure can be summarised as follows:-

  1. A CLG has to register with both Companies House (“CH”) and the Charity Commission (“CC”). A CIO only has to register with the CC.
  2. CH charges fees. The CC does not charge fees.
  3. The Companies Act 2006 imposes various statutory and regulatory requirements upon a CLG including the requirement to file various reports. A CLG also has to file similar information with the CC which inevitably involves duplication and extra expense. A CIO is only required to report to the CC and file accounts and an annual return with them. A CIO does not have to report to CH.
  4. A CIO which has a gross income of less than £250,000 in a financial year can use a simpler receipts and payments basis to prepare its accounts. This option is unavailable to a CLG.
  5. A CLG has to have a minimum income of £5000 for it to also register with the CC. A CIO has no minimum registration threshold.
  6. At commencement of the registration process, a CIO is given a registered charity number which can help when corresponding with HMRC regarding charitable tax advantages and can also help when approaching potential donors and funders.
  7. The set-up costs and ongoing administration costs of a CIO are almost certainly going to be less than those of a CLG.
  8. It can take several months for the CC to process an application for registration, sometimes longer depending upon what issues are raised. A CLG on the other hand can be incorporated very quickly within a matter of days although the registration process with the CC is likely to be the same as for a CIO.
  9. A CIO does not exist until it is registered with the CC and its details are entered in the Register of Charities. A CLG exists from its date of incorporation.
  10. A CIO ceases to exist if it loses its registration at the CC. A CLG on the other hand only ceases to exist when it is struck off the register at CH.
  11. The CIO structure is relatively new and can be unfamiliar to funders and donors.
  12. It is possible that a CIO will be unable to take on secured borrowing because the regulations make no provision for the keeping of a register of charges. Whereas CH maintain a searchable register of charges relating to all companies including a CLG.

Which is the right structure for you?

As a very general rule of thumb the CIO structure (Foundation or Association) will appeal to a medium size charity which for example employs staff and enters into contracts. On the other hand, a CLG may be more appropriate for a large charity which may wish to enter into secured borrowing arrangements. It is also worth remembering that it should be possible to convert from a CIO to a CLG at a later date if for example a need to borrow arises. It is a matter of taking all the advantages and disadvantages into consideration bearing in mind the anticipated future activities and aims of the charity.

If you require further advice regarding the structure of a charitable organisation then Talk to Tollers. We have a dedicated legal team who can work with you and your Charity’s requirements.

All things Tollers

We partner with...

Headway Accreditation 2024
SIA Business Member Badge
Santander Logo
Barclays Logo
HSBC Logo
Sports Aid Logo
Harlestone Park Logo
NGC logo
Northamptonshire County Cricket Club Logo
Legal Fees Insurance Logo
Muddy Stilettos
1 Waterside Way
Bedford Road
Northampton
NN4 7XD
Sat Nav: NN4 7XD
Telephone: 01604 258 558
View our Legal Services
2 Exchange Court
Cottingham Rd
Corby
NN17 1TY
Sat Nav: NN17 1TY
Telephone: 01536 276 727
View our Legal Services
6 Arlington Court
Arlington Business Park
Whittle Way
Stevenage
Sat Nav: SG1 2FS
Telephone: 01438 901 095
View our Legal Services
Moorgate House
201 Silbury Blvd
Milton Keynes
MK9 1JL
Sat Nav: MK9 1JL
Telephone: 01908 396 230
View our Legal Services
148 Bedford Rd
Kempston
Bedford
MK42 8BH
Sat Nav: MK42 8BH
Telephone: 01234 857 014
View our Legal Services
4 Mill St
Oakham
LE15 6EA
Sat Nav: LE15 6EA
Telephone: 01572 756 866
View our Legal Services